March 2026 | FY 2026 Funding, Absenteeism Data & Summer Staffing | GSW Insights Skip to main content

From the Desk of GSW Education Partners

The Budget Picture Is Clearer Now. So Are the Decisions.

Congress finalized the FY 2026 omnibus spending package in late February. For the first time in three years, education program leaders have budget clarity going into spring planning season. It is not everything anyone hoped for, but it is workable.

The signing of the FY 2026 omnibus package is significant because of what it ends as much as what it contains. Months of continuing resolution uncertainty have forced districts and program operators to plan under ambiguous funding conditions. That uncertainty is now resolved.

This edition breaks down what was in the package, what it means for afterschool and summer programming specifically, and what decisions you should be making right now before the summer staffing window closes.

Federal Budget

FY 2026 Omnibus Signed: $79 Billion in Education Funding. Here Is What Survived.

$79B
Total education funding in the FY 2026 omnibus spending package President Biden signed the full-year FY 2026 appropriations package on February 28, 2026, ending seven months of continuing resolution funding and providing program operators with a complete 12-month budget picture.

21st CCLC Preserved at $1.329 Billion

$1.33B
21st CCLC afterschool and summer program funding, maintained at near-prior-year levels After significant advocacy from afterschool networks, the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program was preserved at $1.329 billion, representing a modest 0.6% reduction from FY 2025 levels. This is substantially better than the deep cuts proposed in the initial House budget framework.

For 21st CCLC grantees, this means your current funding cycle is secure and renewal applications can proceed with confidence. State education agencies will be releasing updated guidance on the 2026-27 grant cycle in the coming weeks. Watch for those notices and review your program's performance data now, before the application window opens.

Other Title Funding: What Changed

Title I funding was maintained at current levels with a small inflation-adjusted reduction. Title II teacher quality funding saw a modest cut of approximately 3%. Title IV-A Student Support and Academic Enrichment grants, which many afterschool programs draw on as a supplemental source, were maintained.

The child care funding situation is more complex. The Child Care and Development Block Grant received a nominal appropriation, but the discretionary freeze embedded in the omnibus package limits states' ability to expand child care slots in FY 2026. Programs that rely on CCDBG subsidies to fund families should review their current agreements with state agencies and understand what any enrollment growth will require.

Quick Hits

Child Care Funding Freeze: What Programs Need to Know

The child care provisions in the omnibus received less attention than K-12 line items but affect a significant number of programs that serve school-age children. Three things worth tracking:

  • CCDBG subsidy reimbursement rates are frozen at FY 2025 levels. Programs that have not reviewed their subsidy agreements recently may be absorbing real cost increases without corresponding reimbursement increases.

  • Head Start received a 2% increase, maintaining approximately 833,000 enrollment slots nationally. Programs that coordinate with Head Start for K-3 transitions should confirm any changes with their local grantee.

  • The Pre-K Improvement grants under Preschool Development Grants received level funding. State-administered programs operating under PDG should confirm with their state agency whether grant cycles are affected.

Data Your Program Needs

New Absenteeism Report: The Connection Afterschool Programs Can No Longer Ignore

The Department of Education released updated chronic absenteeism data in late February. The national picture remains concerning: 28% of K-12 students meet the threshold for chronic absenteeism, with rates significantly higher in high-poverty districts, rural schools, and schools serving large proportions of English learners.

62%
of chronically absent students attend schools that lack structured afterschool programming The correlation between chronic absenteeism rates and afterschool program availability is not new, but the magnitude of the gap in the 2025 data is striking. Students in schools with 21st CCLC-funded programs showed statistically lower chronic absenteeism rates compared to matched peers in schools without program access.

The practical implication for program directors is this: your attendance data is a policy-relevant asset right now. If you can show that your program is associated with improved school-day attendance rates, that is a powerful argument for sustained funding, expanded access, and school-day partnership resources.

If your program does not currently collect or analyze data on school-day attendance for participants, this is the year to build that capability. The data infrastructure is not complex, but it does require a data sharing agreement with the school or district, which is worth pursuing now before summer.

Action Item

The Summer Staffing Window Is Shorter Than You Think. Here Is Your Free Guide.

With FY 2026 funding now confirmed, programs that have been holding summer staffing decisions pending budget clarity can move. That is good news, but it also means the window for competitive hiring is compressed. Programs that waited will be competing for the same candidates as programs that started in January.

Three staffing priorities for March and April:

Confirm your summer leadership team first. Site directors, program coordinators, and lead counselors drive summer program quality more than any other single variable. Fill those roles before you focus on line staff.

Build a pipeline, not just a posting. Job boards and posting-only approaches consistently underperform for summer positions. The most effective programs treat summer hiring as a year-round relationship, not a spring transaction.

Use the staffing guide before you post a single position. GSW Education Partners offers a free Summer Staffing Guide for program directors that covers role design, compensation benchmarking, interview frameworks, and onboarding timelines.

Free Resource

Download the Free Summer Staffing Guide for Program Directors

The GSW Summer Staffing Guide covers everything from building competitive job descriptions to structuring 30-day onboarding for summer staff. It is designed for programs of all sizes, from single-site community programs to multi-district 21st CCLC networks.

It is free, no email required, and it is designed to be used, not filed. Download it now and work through it with your leadership team before April.

Dates to Watch

March and April Deadlines for Program Leaders

  • MAR
    15
    State 21st CCLC Guidance Expected

    Most state education agencies will release updated 21st CCLC guidance and program year announcements by mid-March. Check your state agency's website and confirm your program's compliance status before this date.

  • MAR
    28
    Federal Title Programs Q3 Reporting

    Q3 federal program reports are due for most districts on a standard fiscal calendar. Confirm your state's specific deadlines and begin data compilation now if you have not started.

  • APR
    1
    Summer Staffing Competitive Window Opens

    Most afterschool and summer programs target April 1 as the start of competitive summer hiring. Programs that have not begun pipeline work by this date will face a compressed candidate pool for quality positions.

  • APR
    15
    Summer Program Enrollment Should Be Open

    For programs serving high-need families, enrollment should be open no later than mid-April. Families need time to make childcare arrangements, and late enrollment often means lower overall participation, particularly among the families with the most barriers.

  • MAY
    1
    Summer Budget Finalizations

    Districts operating summer programs on grant funding should have final budgets and staffing plans confirmed by May 1 to allow adequate onboarding time for summer staff.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened to 21st CCLC funding in the FY 2026 federal budget?
The FY 2026 omnibus preserved 21st CCLC at $1.33 billion, a 0.6% reduction from FY 2025 levels. While not an increase, this is a meaningful win given the broader budget compression environment. Afterschool advocates held the line and programs can plan with relative stability for the coming year.
How does chronic absenteeism affect afterschool program funding eligibility?
High chronic absenteeism rates in served schools can strengthen the case for 21st CCLC renewals and Title I supplemental programs — the data directly supports the need. Programs should be collecting and presenting attendance data as part of their ongoing funding narratives.
Why is March the most critical planning month for summer programs?
Staffing decisions made in March directly determine program quality in July. The strongest summer programs close their lead educator hires by mid-April, giving them 8-10 weeks for onboarding and curriculum preparation. Programs that wait until May consistently report staffing gaps that affect programming.
What strategies help schools address the chronic absenteeism crisis?
The highest-leverage strategies combine school-day and afterschool responses: family engagement protocols, incentive programs for attendance milestones, truancy intervention partnerships, and integrating attendance tracking between school-day and OST data systems. Treating chronic absenteeism as a shared problem between schools and community partners is key.
How can afterschool organizations access federal education funding streams?
21st CCLC competitive grants are the primary avenue, but also look at Title IV-A Student Support and Academic Enrichment (SSAE) grants, ESSER carryover funds still available in many states, and community school grant programs. Each funding source has distinct eligibility requirements and allowable activities.

Sources and Further Reading

Citations for This Edition

From Our Team

Where We Are Focusing in March

Budget clarity and staffing season running simultaneously is a hard combination for district and program leaders to manage. We have been in this space long enough to know that the programs that come out of spring in the best shape are the ones that treat March as a decision month, not a waiting month.

If you have questions about what the FY 2026 numbers mean for your specific program, or if you want to talk through your summer staffing plan, reach us at contact@gsweducationpartners.com. We are available for a quick call and genuinely happy to help you think it through.

Found this useful? Share it.

Turn Clarity Into Action

The Funding Picture Is Set.
Is Your Program Ready?

FY 2026 funding is signed. Summer staffing season is open. A free 30-minute Discovery Call gives you a clear picture of where your program stands and what to do first.

No obligation. No pitch deck. Just practitioners talking with practitioners.